I just finished reading a book. Literally
just finished.
Committed: A Skeptic Makes Peace with Marriage.
It's the follow-up to the best-selling
book
Eat, Pray, Love by
Elizabeth Gilbert, now a major motion picture starring Julia Roberts.
First of all, let me say: this is going to be a very long post.
Consider yourself warned.
Let me also add that if I could choose to emulate one modern-day writer, it would be this woman. With unabashed sarcasm, wry wit, and obvious intelligence, she takes the reader on a journey through her emotional highs and lows while still very persuasively conveying her educated thoughts and opinions on a whole array of subjects, particularly the topic of marriage.
Two summers ago, in the middle of one of the most lost, frustrating and painful times I hope ever to live through, I picked up
Eat, Pray, Love, which had come highly recommended by several very trusted friends. I had just returned home from a trip to Cuba with my dear friend L., a much-needed getaway for both of us as we recovered from devastating break ups, and I was instantly hooked. Here was a woman who spoke my language. Here was a woman who, living through the cataclysmic effects of a divorce, struggling through severe depression in the aftermath, decided to take a year-long trip to several different countries in order to truly discover who she was and how to make peace with her life.
In Italy, she ate; in India, she prayed; in Indonesia, she loved.
I didn't take a trip around the world. I had no such desire to gorge on Italian decadence, meditate in yogic silence in an Indian ashram, or delve into Southeast Asian culture in an Indonesian hut. Hardly. I did, however, impulsively book a trip to London, England. All alone, sleeping on the couch of a virtual stranger I'd met in Cuba (who did, let me just say, became a good friend), I set off to spend fifteen days in the city I'd always wanted most to visit.
I walked twelve hours a day, buying a day pass for the tube and getting off wherever I felt like it to explore; journal in my bag at all times, I stopped several times a day for a tea, a scone and a quiet moment to explore my thoughts and note my surroundings. It was wonderful, it was healing, it was necessary; in the end, it gave me the courage to come home and, just days later, make the phone call that would set the final stages of my divorce in motion.
When I heard, several months ago, that a follow-up book had been published, I was curious. I was even
more curious to learn that the book was about the author's views on marriage. She had made it very clear in the first book that she was finished with marriage; she was adamant about her desire never to get married again, even though she had, on her travels, met and fallen in love with a Brazilian man.
Similarly, just getting out of my marriage, I was fairly adamant myself that I didn't think I ever wanted to go down that road again. Then, of course, unexpectedly, J. happened. On my travels as well, ironically enough: we met on vacation in the Dominican Republic, and just happened to live in the same city. Suddenly, I was caught up in a vortex of new emotions, terrified and exhilarated and wondering every second what I was doing, knowing what I knew about the end of love. As J. will tell you, I spent most of the first year of our relationship waiting for the other shoe to drop, so to speak; waiting for the land mine to explode under me and once again blow apart my heart.
But here we are now, very serious and very much in love, and I've stopped expecting the worst. I've stopped looking for disaster to strike. It was only natural, then, that I would get around to reading this book; that, beginning to put my own fears aside in once again contemplating a lifetime of marriage to a man that I love, I would be prepared to understand this woman's journey to embracing her own marriage.
Understand it I have.
Challenged I will continue to be.
Hopeful I am, as a result.
I want to quote several different passages from this book, and then expound upon them. Will you stick with me if I do? I know it's long. It's just that there's so much I feel she explains so well, so perfectly; so many things I can relate to and empathize with, said in words that I quite frankly wish I'd written myself.
Here goes, then.
...correct in one respect (we will all be fine eventually), but dead wrong in another respect (we will never entirely move past it, either). In this sense, we divorced folk are something like twentieth-century Japan: We had a culture which was prewar and we have a culture which is postwar, and right between those two histories lies a giant smoking hole.
I will do virtually anything to avoid going through that apocalypse again. But I recognize there's always the possibility of another divorce...because love-based unions make for strangely fragile tethers. I'm not giving up on love, mind you. I still believe in it. But maybe that's the problem. Maybe divorce is the tax we collectively pay as a culture for daring to believe in love - or at least, for daring to link love to such a vital social contract as matrimony. Maybe it is not love and marriage that go together like a horse and carriage after all. Maybe it is love and divorce that go together...like a carriage and a horse.
It's been famously said that second marriage is the triumph of hope over experience, but I'm not entirely sure that's true. It seems to me that first marriages are more hope-drenched affairs, awash in vast expectations and easy optimism. Second marriages are cloaked, I think, in something else: a respect for forces that are bigger than us, maybe. A respect that perhaps even approaches awe.Committed, page 83-85
How insanely, brilliantly true. If the only thing that holds together a marriage is love, then it is a fickle marriage at best. If there is no commitment, if there is no understanding that the shifting nature of personal happiness is not the be-all and end-all of life, if there is no mutual agreement to work things out at all costs, then why marry at all? Love is a choice. Modern-day society has no need of marriage for economic or political reasons, leaving the decision to marry solely in the hands of the emotionally impassioned.
Dangerous? Certainly.
Disastrous? All too often.
So, yes, my love affair...had a wonderful element of romance to it, which I will always cherish. But it was not an infatuation, and here's how I can tell: because I did not demand that he become my Great Emancipator or my Source of All Life, nor did I immediately vanish into that man's chest cavity like a twisted, unrecognizable, parasitical homunculus. During our long period of courtship, I remained intact within my own personality, and I allowed myself to meet...for who he was. In each other's eyes, we may very well have seemed beautiful and perfect and heroic beyond measure, but I never lost sight of our actual realities.
We were two nice enough people, bearing the wounds of some very massive personal disappointments, and we were looking for something that might simply be possible in each other - a certain kindness, a certain attentiveness, a certain shared yearning to trust and be trusted.
To this day, I refuse to burden him with the tremendous responsibility of somehow completing me. By this point in in my life I have figured out that he cannot complete me, even if he wanted to. I've faced enough of my own incompletions to recognize that they belong solely to me. Having learned this essential truth, I can actually tell now where I end and where somebody else begins...as nicely defined by C.S. Lewis, when he wrote of his wife,
'We both knew this: I had my miseries, not hers; she had hers, not mine.'
One plus one, in other words, is sometimes supposed to equal two.Commitment, page 105-106
I don't believe that I realized just how much I depended on my first marriage to somehow fulfill me, to complete me, to bring me unending bliss. Don't get me wrong; I loved him with everything I had. It's just, perhaps, that I didn't really know how to love him and love myself at the same time, and I dove in with unrealistic expectations. I didn't realize how my need to have him complete me was basically a demonstration to him that I would dissolve into the entity of our marriage as though I had nothing that he couldn't absorb. But I did, and I do, as does every human being, and when this became clear to me, it was too late. In fact, I think he expected me to dissolve regardless, as he said many times in many different ways. I didn't realize just how difficult that was going to be. It proved to be impossible; as a result, the marriage proved to be untenable for him, and looking back with perspective, ultimately it would have eventually become unbearable for me as well.
With J., on the other hand, I know my weaknesses. I know my fears, I know my failings, I know my needs, and I know that he's never going to fill all the gaps, try as he might. And I, too, will never fill all of his. Still, we love each other fiercely, protectively, with a selflessness I could never have imagined I was capable of demonstrating. Perhaps this is because we are both all too keenly aware of our shortcomings, and are both unfailingly honest and up front about them.
Whatever the reason may be, I feel more with every passing day that this time, the equation will not be faulty: one real, flawed person plus another real, flawed person does equal two. And two real, flawed, vulnerable, open, honest people who love each other is far better than two scared, unrealistic, closed off, angry, resentful people. Any day. Even if they really do love each other.
When I tried to sort out my resistance to a public wedding ceremony, I had to admit that part of the issue was simple embarrassment. How very awkward to stand in front of one's family and friends (many of whom had been guests at one's first wedding) and swear solemn vows for life all over again. Hadn't they all seen this film already? One's credibility does begin to tarnish after too much of this sort of thing...To paraphrase Oscar Wilde: one divorce may be regarded as a misfortune, but two begins to smack of carelessness.
...how those two little indicting words - this time - make me cringe. Yet it was true. The recollections of last time felt all too recent for me, too painful. Also, I didn't like the idea that guests at a bride's second wedding are just as likely to be thinking about her first spouse as they are to be thinking about her new spouse - and that the bride, too, will probably be remembering her ex-husband on that day. First spouses, I have learned, don't ever really go away - even if you aren't speaking to them any more. They are phantoms who dwell in the corners of our new love stories, never entirely vanishing from sight, materializing in our minds whenever they please, offering up unwelcome comments or bits of painfully accurate criticism.Committed, page 241-242
Ah. There it is, one of my biggest fears about getting married again: the actual ceremony itself. Sure, I'll pick out an exquisite dress, choose beautiful flowers, and walk down a candlelit aisle to my love; but why do other people need to be there? Isn't it really just about the two of us? And, even if family and friends are present to celebrate with the bride and groom, why must it become a spectacle for those phantoms of the first time to witness as well? Why are those ghosts allowed the opportunity to play brutal games of comparison inside my head, to make me agonizingly question myself over and over?
Still, it will be a first for J. And, because of that, I will banish my fears to the darkest recesses of my mind, silence the ghosts, and pray that the day, when it comes, will be new, different, and more incredible than anything I could have imagined. Because it will, ultimately, be about us, and that "us" is more incredible than anything I could have imagined.
It's fitting that the title of this book represents how I now feel about marriage. It's not just about infatuation or love. It's not just about who my parents would have chosen, or what my siblings think, or how well he gets along with my friends.
(Lest you worry, there's not a single person who's seen J. and I together who has ever expressed a negative opinion. Not so with my first marriage, let me say).
Remember the horse and carriage...or the carriage and the horse?
Marriage is, ultimately, about commitment. Through the good times and the bad, whether deliriously happy or desperately sad, I want to know that at the end of the day, my commitment to the man I marry will last a lifetime. For in the end, it's not about love. It's about the commitment that joins two hearts and lives together.
Come what may.